The compiler will mark struct members with those builtins, but won't
declare the capability until that member is accessed by some executable
instruction.
Test changes:
- spv.430.vert: was missing ClipDistance capability.
- spv.precise.tese: remove TessellationPointSize capability.
Reimplement the whole workflow to make that: precise'ness of struct
members won't spread to other non-precise members of the same struct
instance.
Approach:
1. Build the map from symbols to their defining nodes. And for each
object node (StructIndex, DirectIndex, Symbol nodes, etc), generates an
accesschain path. Different AST nodes that indicating a same object
should have the same accesschain path.
2. Along the building phase in step 1, collect the initial set of
'precise' (AST qualifier: 'noContraction') objects' accesschain paths.
3. Start with the initial set of 'precise' accesschain paths, use it as
a worklist, do as the following steps until the worklist is empty:
1) Pop an accesschain path from worklist.
2) Get the symbol part from the accesschain path.
3) Find the defining nodes of that symbol.
4) For each defining node, check whether it is defining a 'precise'
object, or its assignee has nested 'precise' object. Get the
incremental path from assignee to its nested 'precise' object (if
any).
5) Traverse the right side of the defining node, obtain the
accesschain paths of the corresponding involved 'precise' objects.
Update the worklist with those new objects' accesschain paths.
Label involved operations with 'noContraction'.
In each step, whenever we find the parent object of an nested object is
'precise' (has 'noContraction' qualifier), we let the nested object
inherit the 'precise'ness from its parent object.
